Русский New site

Advanced search

[ New messages · Forum rules · Members ]
Page 41 of 46«1239404142434546»
Forum » SpaceEngine » Off-topic Discussions » Conspiracy Theories (And UFOs, ancient astronauts, and other such things.)
Conspiracy Theories
JackDoleDate: Thursday, 21.07.2016, 17:28 | Message # 601
Star Engineer
Group: Local Moderators
Germany
Messages: 1737
Status: Offline
Quote spacer ()
what if space engineer is an alien himself.

Quote JackDole ()
Or maybe ... but no, that would be too far-fetched!





Don't forget to look here.

 
steeljaw354Date: Thursday, 21.07.2016, 18:40 | Message # 602
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 862
Status: Offline
Alright you have provoked me enough, this thing about spaceengineer being an alien or whatever is false, not supported by thousands of reports and sightings and whatnot. Just because it is a UFO doesn't mean it is alien, some may be. Another thing is in every image of earth the clouds are always the same.... why? Why does nasa cut it's live feed? Why isn't there a camera on the moon with live feed?

Why does nasa blurr out their images and process them? Legends and myths arise from something.


Edited by steeljaw354 - Thursday, 21.07.2016, 18:48
 
apenpaapDate: Thursday, 21.07.2016, 19:02 | Message # 603
World Builder
Group: Users
Antarctica
Messages: 1063
Status: Offline
Quote steeljaw354 ()
Another thing is in every image of earth the clouds are always the same.... why?


Do tell us why.





I occasionally stream at http://www.twitch.tv/magistermystax. Sometimes SE, sometimes other games.
 
steeljaw354Date: Thursday, 21.07.2016, 19:14 | Message # 604
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 862
Status: Offline
I have no idea.

Also another thing is those strange crystal skulls, scientists say they couldn't have formed on earth. http://www.crystalskulls.com/crystal-skull-theory.html
 
MosfetDate: Thursday, 21.07.2016, 20:46 | Message # 605
World Builder
Group: Users
Italy
Messages: 722
Status: Offline
http://phys.org/news....al.html

Quote steeljaw354 ()
Another thing is in every image of earth the clouds are always the same

Clearly this is wrong, but are you talking about moon missions?

Quote Mosfet ()
Why does nasa cut it's live feed?

you know, they dont always cut the feeds. Maybe you don't know, but live feeds need bandwidth they simply can't provide continuously. They have a very bad internet connection up there.

Quote
Why isn't there a camera on the moon with live feed?

Costs. There was a transmitted feed of the departure of apollo 17 module from the moon, if I'm not mistaken. But you are really suggesting that a live feed could be still working since 1972? Come on, I'm sure you are better than that.
Do some research yourself before throwing something like this.





"Time is illusion. Lunchtime doubly so."
Douglas N. Adams
My mods
Asus x555ub: cpu i5-6200u - ram 4gb - gpu nvidia geforce 940m 2gb vram


Edited by Mosfet - Thursday, 21.07.2016, 21:39
 
WatsisnameDate: Thursday, 21.07.2016, 22:00 | Message # 606
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2611
Status: Offline
A better question might be why there should be a live feed from the lunar surface at all? Talk about boring.

"And today we see... exactly the same view we had yesterday, except the Sun has moved very slightly."





 
steeljaw354Date: Thursday, 21.07.2016, 22:33 | Message # 607
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 862
Status: Offline
Quote
Quote steeljaw354 ()
Another thing is in every image of earth the clouds are always the same

Clearly this is wrong, but are you talking about moon missions?

Quote Mosfet ()
Why does nasa cut it's live feed?

you know, they dont always cut the feeds. Maybe you don't know, but live feeds need bandwidth they simply can't provide continuously. They have a very bad internet connection up there.

Quote
Why isn't there a camera on the moon with live feed?

Costs. There was a transmitted feed of the departure of apollo 17 module from the moon, if I'm not mistaken. But you are really suggesting that a live feed could be still working since 1972? Come on, I'm sure you are better than that.
Do some research yourself before throwing something like this.


I'm not talking about moon missions like Apollo. No, I'm suggesting a new satellite that will orbit around the moon like the ISS does so we get live views of the landscape. With our current technology it is possible.


Edited by steeljaw354 - Thursday, 21.07.2016, 22:38
 
spacerDate: Thursday, 21.07.2016, 23:03 | Message # 608
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Israel
Messages: 1258
Status: Offline
Quote steeljaw354 ()
I'm not talking about moon missions like Apollo. No, I'm suggesting a new satellite that will orbit around the moon like the ISS does so we get live views of the landscape. With our current technology it is possible.

but too expensive. why would you put a orbiter around the moon just to take live videos? imagine the amount of data we need to restore all of the videos etc. there is orbiters around the moon but they are sceince missions. like LRO. puting an orbiter that will orbit the moon just to take video is too much expensive right now, we can do it like you said...we can. but not worth it right now.

now lets go to the topic of your belief, see...i am not disporve you, i am myself take the possiblty that nasa or government hidning something, no one can know=i cant disporved it.





"we began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still"
-carl sagan

-space engine photographer
 
steeljaw354Date: Thursday, 21.07.2016, 23:43 | Message # 609
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 862
Status: Offline
Well a few people want to see high quality images and such, most high quality ones have been explained away as CGI. And who is to say that whatever evidence I provide has a convenient explanation that is not what I have said

Edited by steeljaw354 - Thursday, 21.07.2016, 23:46
 
WatsisnameDate: Friday, 22.07.2016, 00:27 | Message # 610
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2611
Status: Offline
So you want to spend millions of dollars to take live images of a surface that is already completely mapped and doesn't change except for the occasional small new impact crater, so that other conspiracy-minded people can claim the whole thing is still a hoax and the live images are computer generated?




 
steeljaw354Date: Friday, 22.07.2016, 00:29 | Message # 611
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 862
Status: Offline
Perhaps even a space station with a live view of the surface like how you have the space station camera which is live which records the surface moving. The conspiracy that space is a hoax is a TOTAL LIE, those people have no brain what so ever.

Edited by steeljaw354 - Friday, 22.07.2016, 00:34
 
WatsisnameDate: Friday, 22.07.2016, 00:37 | Message # 612
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2611
Status: Offline
A lunar orbital station? That'd be pretty cool. smile




 
spacerDate: Friday, 22.07.2016, 00:58 | Message # 613
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Israel
Messages: 1258
Status: Offline
steeljaw354, i have the feeling that if it was actually done, you would say that nasa edit the live video and its not live at all...
its like never ending circle of guys that think everything is covered.
Quote Watsisname ()
A lunar orbital station? That'd be pretty cool.

yep happy a station around the moon in the future could help us as some sort of stop and refuel spaceships that on thier way to the outer solar system, but i mean huge stations. meanwhile we need a base first to mine moon resources and then build a station that restore all of that stuff for missions to come





"we began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still"
-carl sagan

-space engine photographer
 
steeljaw354Date: Friday, 22.07.2016, 01:00 | Message # 614
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 862
Status: Offline
Well it would probably cut out when it goes to the far side of the moon. Radio silence unless you have a few other satellites orbiting in various inclined orbits signals could be beamed off of to send the signal towards Earth.

Edited by steeljaw354 - Friday, 22.07.2016, 01:01
 
JackDoleDate: Friday, 22.07.2016, 14:25 | Message # 615
Star Engineer
Group: Local Moderators
Germany
Messages: 1737
Status: Offline
Quote Watsisname ()
A lunar orbital station? That'd be pretty cool.

[satire]
So, for that matter, that's suspicious.

At the end of the 60s, the early 70s of the last century, almost everyone believed we could do in 2000 holiday on the moon.
Or at least a weekend getaway in the next space hotel in Earth orbit.
Why is this not so?
Who could have an interest in that it is not so?
Of course, the aliens.
Amazingly, this was just at the time when the first micro-processors appeared!
Probably the aliens have promoted the development of computer technology, to distract us from the development of space travel!

The goal is that we lose ourselves in a virtual world, and forget the real world.
Presumably Zuckerberg is also an agent of the extraterrestrials.
[/satire]

(Or maybe it's not a satire?)





Don't forget to look here.

 
Forum » SpaceEngine » Off-topic Discussions » Conspiracy Theories (And UFOs, ancient astronauts, and other such things.)
Page 41 of 46«1239404142434546»
Search: