RUS New site

Advanced search

[ New messages · Forum rules · Members ]
Page 2 of 2«12
Forum » SpaceEngine » General Discussions » Directed proceedural generation of asteroid belts (Questions regarding creating asteroid belts)
Directed proceedural generation of asteroid belts
NeapolitanBoyDate: Monday, 31.08.2015, 16:46 | Message # 16
Space Tourist
Group: Users
Italy
Messages: 34
Status: Offline
The_Schwam,

you are the only person who can help me! Can I ask you a question about GURPS?

I'm studying GURPS-Space in order to create believable star systems for a science-fiction novel.

The manual is very clear and I've already read the "errata corrige", but I am not sure if the third column, page 117, takes into account a situation where the planet is tide-locked to its moon but NOT to its star (Pluto is a great example: it is tide-locked to Caronte - it always shows the same face to Caronte -, but it is not tide-locked to the Sun).

In a Pluto-like situation, I should use the "Rotation Period Table", right? In fact, my "alien Pluto" is tide-locked to its moon but doesn't show always the same face to its star too. Right? But, since, as a rule, any planet tide-locked to something (the moon in this case) would have a Total Tide Effect =or>50, in my planetary Rotation Period calculations I should do: (number=or>50) + 3d + 10 (because the planet is a standard terrestrial) = a number surely >36, which implies the use of the following table, the Special Rotation Table.

Is this procedure correct?

I have doubts only because the way sentences are written in the paragraph make me think that the author hasn't kept this Pluto-like situation into account.

Grazie.

P.S.: I know it's a very specific question, but unfortunately there aren't many forums to ask this kind of doubts.
 
Forum » SpaceEngine » General Discussions » Directed proceedural generation of asteroid belts (Questions regarding creating asteroid belts)
Page 2 of 2«12
Search: